9 Comments
User's avatar
Joe From the Bronx's avatar

Supreme Court justices (as in today's Order List) sometimes provide a "statement" and this seems to be what Judge Ho (not the good one) is doing. Decades more of this guy? Sigh.

Chris Geidner's avatar

Yes, I know about statements — and mention that in the list of what this could be.

However, this from Ho is *not* just a statement. He disagrees. The per curiam says, "We express no opinion on the disposition of that motion." He wrote, "The motion for a stay pending appeal should be granted." He very much expressed an opinion on the disposition of that motion.

Joe From the Bronx's avatar

"dissented in spirit but chose not to actually dissent"

Statements are sometimes disagree-y without actually dissenting.

It is not explicitly stated as anything, as you say, but it comes off to me as a statement-like thing. But, I have no deep opinion on the matter.

Chris Geidner's avatar

I'm honestly not going to debate this. Have a good night, Joe.

Joeff's avatar

Once Trump is disposed of and his SCOTUS dreams die, Ho and his ilk will be chasing the big bucks in the private sector.

Joe From the Bronx's avatar

That's the dream. Many of these people like being federal judges. Lifetime sinecure with the power to make law.

Lance Khrome's avatar

Ho forever acts out the "tRump's ho' " role he so dearly relishes.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Feb 21, 2024
Comment deleted
Debbie's avatar

Seriously, tho!! Who the blankity blank did drag queens ever hurt, ffs? And why, pray tell, are some so scared of the mighty power of lip syncing, splashy wigs, heels & clever pseudonyms?