8 Comments
User's avatar
Kathleen M Kendrick's avatar

I just watched that program. The professor was right. Jacob's monologue was amazing. This was a really great discussion by the three of you. Thanks for linking us to it.

Barnation Station's avatar

Great job, Chris!!!

Susan Linehan's avatar

Sounds like the judge was actually saying "uh, folks, just a WEE bit of evidence for the court??"

Jon W's avatar

Chris, There's another reason why the government has never used the ATRC until now. The law makes it relatively easy to remove non-LPRs, sometimes even on the basis of classified info, and to remove LPRs on non-terrorism-related grounds if those grounds are available, all without invoking ATRC procedures. The *only* context in which it makes sense for the government to invoke the ATRC is if it wishes to remove an LPR on terrorism grounds, and the LPR isn't otherwise removable, and the government isn't willing to publicly disclose what's going on. That wasn't a thing before Trump. Jon Weinberg

J. A. Sullivan's avatar

This is on the Democrats too given the allocation of more power to Clinton.

Jacobs-Meadway Roberta's avatar

WTF - and this is justified on what grounds?

ZCob's avatar

C Geidner alwaya irrufutsbke info he prints. Thanks for this clarity one more thing Blanche I doing behind the curl of deceit