Lol. Thanks, Jordan, for your constantly-dismissive-but-still-always-here commentary. I'm sorry that my analysis, having covered and written about the courts for 20+ years, is different than yours, but, it's still journalism. Sometimes I take positions when I've reached a conclusion on an issue, but you are welcome to — and often do — ta…
Lol. Thanks, Jordan, for your constantly-dismissive-but-still-always-here commentary. I'm sorry that my analysis, having covered and written about the courts for 20+ years, is different than yours, but, it's still journalism. Sometimes I take positions when I've reached a conclusion on an issue, but you are welcome to — and often do — take a different position in light of the very information I provided. That's journalism!
Beyond that, I'm often just sending out breaking news as I take it in on social media — now primarily Bluesky — and then taking the time to analyze it and contextualize it, and put that down here. Sometimes here, posts are just the breaking news, but that's not as helpful and not what my readers want. It's not ever what I've done since originally launching Law Dork as a blog in 2003. If you want that, read a wire report.
Lol. Thanks, Jordan, for your constantly-dismissive-but-still-always-here commentary. I'm sorry that my analysis, having covered and written about the courts for 20+ years, is different than yours, but, it's still journalism. Sometimes I take positions when I've reached a conclusion on an issue, but you are welcome to — and often do — take a different position in light of the very information I provided. That's journalism!
Beyond that, I'm often just sending out breaking news as I take it in on social media — now primarily Bluesky — and then taking the time to analyze it and contextualize it, and put that down here. Sometimes here, posts are just the breaking news, but that's not as helpful and not what my readers want. It's not ever what I've done since originally launching Law Dork as a blog in 2003. If you want that, read a wire report.