If statutes are ambiguous, shouldn't Congress fix them? I agree with setting aside Chevron deference. I do not agree that this is a judicial power grab. Maybe I am naive but I think the Court is saying to Congress - you were elected to write clear laws, please do your job.
If statutes are ambiguous, shouldn't Congress fix them? I agree with setting aside Chevron deference. I do not agree that this is a judicial power grab. Maybe I am naive but I think the Court is saying to Congress - you were elected to write clear laws, please do your job.
Under Republican control the House is minimally functional in passing anything. If they have to provide written detailed meticulous guidance on implementation, minimal will turn into zero. Maybe that is a good thing. They can spend their time kicking things down the road rather than legislating.
Thats the point and way it was designed. It should be hard to get things through congress. Therefore, local states should be making most of the rules/regulations because those are more responsive to those they represent.
If statutes are ambiguous, shouldn't Congress fix them? I agree with setting aside Chevron deference. I do not agree that this is a judicial power grab. Maybe I am naive but I think the Court is saying to Congress - you were elected to write clear laws, please do your job.
Under Republican control the House is minimally functional in passing anything. If they have to provide written detailed meticulous guidance on implementation, minimal will turn into zero. Maybe that is a good thing. They can spend their time kicking things down the road rather than legislating.
Thats the point and way it was designed. It should be hard to get things through congress. Therefore, local states should be making most of the rules/regulations because those are more responsive to those they represent.