Thanks for the analysis. This is a good co-read with Steve Vladeck's Monday substack.
The per curiam saying how "important" it is that the justices agreed on something not that important (the Administration only tried to stop one of the three things) is clarified when you go into the weeds.
Thanks for the analysis. This is a good co-read with Steve Vladeck's Monday substack.
The per curiam saying how "important" it is that the justices agreed on something not that important (the Administration only tried to stop one of the three things) is clarified when you go into the weeds.
Thanks for the analysis. This is a good co-read with Steve Vladeck's Monday substack.
The per curiam saying how "important" it is that the justices agreed on something not that important (the Administration only tried to stop one of the three things) is clarified when you go into the weeds.