The Wall Street Journal hyped Moore v. US as a "wealth tax" case. There was no ruling on that, but lots of skepticism. Only Justice Jackson signaled openness.
The slow pace of opinions seems to be partially a matter of carefully sailing through the shoals, including the purported Roberts minimalism that mixes in more than it might at first seem.
For instance, a "win" on standing, but a strong conscience exemption in the abortion pill case.
The tax case is another carefully crafted affair. Coverage will help clarify the details. Oh, Alito probably should not have taken part in Moore. Alito is a problem, as someone said in the past.
The slow pace of opinions seems to be partially a matter of carefully sailing through the shoals, including the purported Roberts minimalism that mixes in more than it might at first seem.
For instance, a "win" on standing, but a strong conscience exemption in the abortion pill case.
The tax case is another carefully crafted affair. Coverage will help clarify the details. Oh, Alito probably should not have taken part in Moore. Alito is a problem, as someone said in the past.
I got in the recusal link, but not the is a problem link, tonight. Alas.
"how thought think Kavanaugh"
Was this meant to be "how they thought Kavanaugh"?
Yeah, meant to replace "think" with "thought" and replaced "they" instead! Fixed!