20 Comments
Oct 16, 2023Liked by Chris Geidner

Thank you, Chris, for calling out a singular grievous instance of jurisprudential injustice and, frankly, a tidal wave of juducial malpractice by a maleovelent Supreme Court majority that was larded with incompetent Trump appointees.

Expand full comment
Oct 16, 2023Liked by Chris Geidner

Landry...[sigh], he makes Bobby Jindal look like a crusading reformer.

Expand full comment
Oct 16, 2023Liked by Chris Geidner

As a law student, it’s really shocking to me how little coverage there is on issues like this. Even the words “shadow docket” are treated like taboo around here and honestly, legal education’s lack of anchorage in reality is complicit to the lack of transparency we later normalize. Thank you for covering this! You get the genz stamp of approval for being a cool dude and keeping us informed. Will be recommending your newsletter to other nerds around here. 👍🏽

Expand full comment

Whatever one thinks on the merits, the court's silence and inaction would be easier to accept or even defend if the court's docket were pressed to the buffers. To the contrary, the can-it-possibly-go-lower declining number of grants has been a thing for as long as I've been watching the court; eighteen years now. Here's my pitch: I think that Congress should restore mandatory jurisdiction in some cases, and death penalty collateral review strikes me as an obvious candidate. We are talking about a baker's dozen cases a term. See https://www.statista.com/statistics/271100/number-of-executions-in-the-us. Don't tell me the court doesn't have time, cf. https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/SCOTUSblog-Final-STAT-PACK-OT2021.pdf, or that someone's life isn't high enough stakes. I see no adequate reason why a court that takes seventy cases a year shouldn't at least be obliged to explain why—even if it's only in a one page per curiam opinion—a man's request that he not be killed by his government should be refused.

Expand full comment

Chris,

RIP Jedidiah Murphy. Texas’s legal insurrection continues aided by the Supremes tendency of silence in the shadow docket. Silence speaks loudly by SCUTUS’s shadow docket ruling lifting the stay that prevented Jedidiah’s execution not intelligently, not jurisprudentially, rather, institutional cowardice.

Expand full comment

The only solution I see is for Biden to increase the size of SCOTUS.

Thanks for bringing this to our attention

RIP Jedediah Murphy.

Expand full comment

I not sure how to get these true facts to the US Supreme Court Justices. My name is Johnny Maloy. On 03-31-2011 my only bioson, Riley Maloy AB 8616 was beat to death in Folsom Prison Ad Seg PC by 3 lifers, involves 2 Folsom Prison Guards, was planned by Charles Manson from a differant Ca DOC Prison.

I have pictures. Then after Autopsey, CaAG Kamala Harris- now US VP Kamala Harris, rewro5e murder facts in attempt to save Ca money in a WRONGFUL DEATH LAW SEUIT. then Kamala Harris lied to US congress saying she never had contact with criminals other than prosecuting criminals, but by rewriting murder facts, or ordering it done, CaAG Harris should have a 1st degree murder charge after the fact aka aiding and abbetting a 1st degree murder.. These charges will remove her as US VP, and no statute of limitations on US Federal charges..

Please run a full scale US Federal Investigation on this matter, these are only the basic facts, there are more crimes involved in this crime like Riley Maloy wasn't read his Miranda Rights before questioning in a Long Beach, Ca hospital and the presiding judge is a PROTEM JUDGE not seated on the Ca Attorney's Bar, aka an Adolph Hitler loving street ppl with no formal education in LAW and LAW PRACTICES..

Thank-you for reading this document, I've been trying to find legal help with this matter but no attny will help because of the ppl involved..

JCM

noneyajohn78@gmail.com

5755185869

Expand full comment

Sotomayor used to occasionally dissent or provide statements of concern without dissenting.

Jackson dissented once after the execution. But, for whatever reason, this is coming to be the norm.

I don't like the lack of comments in these final orders generally. But, this was a more atypical case where the lower court granted a stay. Had to explain why it was wrong AND explain why they shouldn't have intervened. I'm annoyed at the liberals' silence.

Expand full comment

We should stop acting like there are “unnoted” dissents in shadow docket orders and such. If a justice can’t be bothered to even note a dissent, much less write something, we should assume they voted in favor of the action. Stop pretending they silently object when there’s no evidence.

Expand full comment