They are asking for the court to order the FDA to suspend or withdraw its Sept. 2000 approval of Mifeprex for medication abortion (and subsequent related actions easing access). (Again, this is in the injunction request, which is linked to in the piece.) If mifepristone was approved for another use unrelated to abortion at another time, my understanding is that that would not change.
They are asking for the court to order the FDA to suspend or withdraw its Sept. 2000 approval of Mifeprex for medication abortion (and subsequent related actions easing access). (Again, this is in the injunction request, which is linked to in the piece.) If mifepristone was approved for another use unrelated to abortion at another time, my understanding is that that would not change.
Thank you for explaining. I have linked to your coverage in my article for Bleeding Heartland.
I find it interesting that Iowa's AG (who often brags about joining federal cases challenging Biden administration policies) has not publicly announced any of her recent anti-abortion moves.
They are asking for the court to order the FDA to suspend or withdraw its Sept. 2000 approval of Mifeprex for medication abortion (and subsequent related actions easing access). (Again, this is in the injunction request, which is linked to in the piece.) If mifepristone was approved for another use unrelated to abortion at another time, my understanding is that that would not change.
Thank you for explaining. I have linked to your coverage in my article for Bleeding Heartland.
I find it interesting that Iowa's AG (who often brags about joining federal cases challenging Biden administration policies) has not publicly announced any of her recent anti-abortion moves.
ShouldnтАЩt courts at least pretend to be impartial, what happened to judicial review