One of the things nestled in this opinion that I haven't seen discussed much: the court states that "unborn child" is a factually accurate term. Relator's argument was that the term "unborn child" is improperly argumentative. The Court shuts that down by sidestepping into (what I think is) a much bigger can of worms. I've never seen a co…
One of the things nestled in this opinion that I haven't seen discussed much: the court states that "unborn child" is a factually accurate term. Relator's argument was that the term "unborn child" is improperly argumentative. The Court shuts that down by sidestepping into (what I think is) a much bigger can of worms. I've never seen a court do this before. It seems like a small but ominous stepping stone for future courts to cite.
One of the things nestled in this opinion that I haven't seen discussed much: the court states that "unborn child" is a factually accurate term. Relator's argument was that the term "unborn child" is improperly argumentative. The Court shuts that down by sidestepping into (what I think is) a much bigger can of worms. I've never seen a court do this before. It seems like a small but ominous stepping stone for future courts to cite.