21 Comments
User's avatar
Shelley Powers's avatar

These Trump judges won't rest until they eviscerate Congress and the Executive Branch.

They literally want to finish what the Civil War started.

Expand full comment
Cynbel Terreus's avatar

I wonder how they expect to enforce their own rulings as they seem to want to legislate from the bench.

Expand full comment
Joeff's avatar

Their rulings will mean NO enforcement.

Expand full comment
𝓙𝓪𝓼𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓮 𝓦𝓸𝓵𝓯𝓮's avatar

No there will be law enforcement but only against us🙁 Though that's not really much different from the 2 tier justice system today.

Expand full comment
Cynbel Terreus's avatar

I don't mean just this ruling, I mean their rulings and approach in general and where it would lead/has lead.

Expand full comment
hw's avatar

One of the newsletters I read recently quoted a passage from "The Grapes of Wrath".

If people still cannot imagine the future we are facing, based (in no small part) on Don Mcgahn's judicial choices, a re-reading of this classic should suffice.

Expand full comment
Susan Linehan's avatar

"if we apply OSHA’s toothless version of the intelligible principle test, we upset the social contract on which our republic stands." I would say that anyone who came of working age in the past 53 years well understands the social contract under which the republic--and their lives--stand.

Expand full comment
christopher o'loughlin's avatar

Google Ralph Nader if you want to know what industries create without federal government regulation. Google Ford Pinto to see what the world was like before federal transportation safety regulations.

Expand full comment
Opinion Haver's avatar

they won't be happy until the poor are dead, enslaved, and the world is burning as we pile fuel into our own furnace.

they must be stopped.

Expand full comment
Opinion Haver's avatar

materially- there is no difference between an oligarch and a monarch. one just has more plausible deniability based on revisionist technicality.

"well they're not kings, so its ok!"

Expand full comment
𝓙𝓪𝓼𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓮 𝓦𝓸𝓵𝓯𝓮's avatar

Ummm... That's already our reality😔

Expand full comment
travis.fili's avatar

This disdain for OSHA, combined with Republicans pushing back on child labor laws (not to mention their position on Covid-era restrictions), makes conservatives look like cartoon villains. Who are they fighting for? Not workers.

Expand full comment
Andre's avatar

So what is the ultimate goal? Neuter the EPA and OSHA for example? How do we then ensure water, workplace safety ? I guess we have civil litigation for damages?

Congress would have to provide precise legislation in its place.

It seems like the protections we all take for granted would disappear? And Congress would have to expand dramatically to handle the change?

It’s difficult for me to comprehend where this could go, so please let us know the worst case scenario.

Expand full comment
Joeff's avatar

He should have labeled his opinion “dubitante” rather than dissenting.

If SCOTUS actually scuttled the administrative state, all their lawyer pals who get rich on regulation cases would have to become lobbyists.

Expand full comment
Susan Linehan's avatar

Also, I wonder if Allstates has considered what its liability or worker comp insurance premiums would be if their activities (and the activities of their peers) were completely unregulated?

Expand full comment
Michèle Sharik's avatar

Some states have already relaxed their child labor laws. Now OSHA is on the chopping block.

Expand full comment
Ian Mark Sirota's avatar

If anyone is surprised by this, I’d love to know why. The goal here has always been to restore pre-Civil War America, in all respects.

Expand full comment
Chris Geidner's avatar

I honestly find these kind of comments to be really frustrating. I just saw a similar thing on Twitter, so I feel like I should expand on it here.

Obviously, nothing is a “surprise” to everyone, but, at the same time and just as obviously, it is a surprise to many. And my job is to explain it -- without condescending to people that they should know it already. Additionally, the specifics matter and while the big-picture might not be a “surprise,” the specifics can have surprising elements and, regardless, they are relevant and a part of story-telling to educate more people.

Ultimately, I feel like this sort of a response is the left’s version of when people on the right respond to every story about a diversity-related “first” by responding, “And why does that matter?”

Expand full comment
Ian Mark Sirota's avatar

Understood. I won't do it again.

Expand full comment
Joeff's avatar

Today is gonna be the day that [we’re] gonna throw it back to you

And by now, you should've somehow realised what you gotta do

[We] don't believe that anybody feels the way [ypu] do about [OSHA] now

Expand full comment
Jean in Florida's avatar

The Judges not only want to take away Presidential powers, but Congressional powers also, & rule us as if it were 1776.

Expand full comment