The three hours of arguments focused on what test should be adopted to judge these questions. As Ainsley Hayes once told us, "They're all about duty."
Always nice to hear about the court having a serious, nuanced discussion about a genuinely difficult issue.
Nice to see the West Wing cite. A better link might be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxxrbATivj0
Always nice to hear from Ainsley even if Joe Quincy would have been nice too.
Republicans were nicer back then.
Are you really not going to cite to the case or oral argument?
Am I right in thinking all of this becomes moot if, instead of blocking citizens’ accounts, officials muted them instead? The main issue seems to be that everyone has a right to see what leaders are saying, not that everyone has a right to be heard all the time?