Law Dork with Chris Geidner

Share this post

Joe Biden's criminal justice regression

www.lawdork.com

Joe Biden's criminal justice regression

We were promised that Biden had progressed on criminal justice issues from his Senate days. Most recent signs suggest that, if he had, he's now going back to his old ways.

Chris Geidner
Mar 7
15
5
Share this post

Joe Biden's criminal justice regression

www.lawdork.com

On March 2, President Joe Biden announced that he would be the first president in more than 30 years — the first since President George H.W. Bush — to sign legislation overturning an act of the D.C. Council.

Biden said he would do so in support of Republican efforts to overturn D.C. Council’s much-needed and long-negotiated changes to its criminal code, tweeting:

Twitter avatar for @POTUS
President Biden @POTUS
I support D.C. Statehood and home-rule – but I don’t support some of the changes D.C. Council put forward over the Mayor’s objections – such as lowering penalties for carjackings. If the Senate votes to overturn what D.C. Council did – I’ll sign it.
8:33 PM ∙ Mar 2, 2023
10,654Likes1,554Retweets

Biden tweeted his announcement before the Senate could even vote on the House resolution. By doing so when he did, Biden — who previously claimed to support both D.C. home rule and criminal justice reform — let loose Senate Democrats to vote against both of those interests.

And, that’s exactly what has happened. By Monday afternoon, CNN’s Manu Raju was reporting that more than 20 Democrats were expected to now vote in favor of rejecting the D.C. act.

Slate’s Mark Jospeh Stern already wrote about “Why Biden Stabbed D.C. in the Back.” Check it out.

Incidentally, Biden also stabbed House Democrats in the back. His administration issued a Statement of Administration Policy (SAP) before the House vote, announcing that they opposed the effort to overturn the D.C. act. Then, after the House members voted with that in mind, Biden said he objected to D.C.’s act and would sign the disapproval resolution.

The administration got it right the first time.

It’s worth noting the excellent argument that the Biden administration of Feb. 6 made against the Biden statement of March 2. From the SAP:

For far too long, the more than 700,000 residents of Washington, D.C. have been deprived of full representation in the U.S. Congress. This taxation without representation and denial of self-governance is an affront to the democratic values on which our Nation was founded. [The disapproval resolutions] are both clear examples of how the District of Columbia continues to be denied true self-governance and why it deserves statehood. While we work towards making Washington, D.C. the 51st state of our Union, Congress should respect the District of Columbia’s autonomy to govern its own local affairs.

So, Biden’s respect for D.C.’s autonomy went out the window.

But, when it comes to Biden’s position on the D.C. criminal code revision, this is about more.

This is about Biden’s long history on these issues and Democrats’ long history of caving on criminal justice the second Republicans try to fear-monger on it.

And yet, looking today, it doesn’t appear that Biden has changed or that Democrats have learned anything.

Biden’s main complaint about the act is false, as Stern has shouted from the rooftops, and most people complaining about the act don’t know what it actually does.

Twitter avatar for @mjs_DC
Mark Joseph Stern @mjs_DC
To the extent that these updates qualify as "criminal justice reform," they are the sort of reforms that Joe Biden claims to support, like abolishing most mandatory minimums. And just to reiterate: THE BILL WOULD NOT REDUCE SENTENCES FOR CARJACKING! slate.com/news-and-polit…
What’s so frustrating about the spigot of misinformation about the new law is that the RCCA is not, and has never been, designed to reduce incarceration in D.C. The District has one of the highest incarceration rates in the country, yet the commission was not instructed to consider mass incarceration when revising the code. Its revisions are thus in line with uncontroversial moves conducted in red and blue jurisdictions alike since the 1960s. Other changes are just plain-vanilla criminal justice reforms espoused by mainstream Democrats like President Joe Biden. For instance, the bill abolishes most mandatory minimum sentences, relics of the 1980s that create extreme racial disparities. (It retains several, including for first-degree murder.) Mandatory minimums are opposed by Biden himself and strongly discouraged by Attorney General Merrick Garland’s Justice Department.
10:03 PM ∙ Mar 2, 2023
204Likes42Retweets

What’s almost worse, broader claims about crime in D.C. aren’t based on facts, as David Menschel pointed out in a thread on Twitter. (Go check it out. I’ll wait.)

Twitter avatar for @davidminpdx
David Menschel @davidminpdx
1. As blatantly false fearmongering about crime reaches new heights in Washington DC, I just want to point out that data shows violent crime is at historic lows in DC. Step one: here is FBI data showing violent crime in DC 1985-2020.
Image
6:44 PM ∙ Mar 6, 2023
746Likes308Retweets

And, the bottom-line reality is that Republicans would be fear-mongering around crime in 2024 no matter what Democrats do this year, just as they did in 2022 and 2020 and so on and so on.

Despite a lifetime of chances to learn and after a 2020 campaign of promising that he had changed on criminal justice, Biden appears to be moving backwards — to his old school, “Lock the S.O.B.s Up” roots — for 2024.

It’s not just Biden’s betrayal on the D.C. criminal code revision, either.

There’s also the fact that after campaigning on ending the federal death penalty, the Biden administration is still seeking to put a new person on federal death row, as Law Dork has covered previously.

And, even as D.C. was taking in the news of Biden’s betrayal of his commitment to D.C. statehood, Politico highlighted on Monday that New York City Mayor Eric Adams — the antithesis of progressive criminal justice proposals if there ever were one — would be a key surrogate for the president’s yet-to-be-officially-announced re-election campaign.

I’ve tweeted a lot of anger about this, but, at the end of the day, I’m mainly left with disappointment.

It would be nice if Biden — who is truly at his best when showing his understanding of the human condition when addressing those who have experienced great loss — could learn how to put that brain, heart, and soul to work when he considers the criminal legal system and the undeniable damage that mass incarceration causes.

It would, at least, be a good start.

Thanks for reading Law Dork. Subscribe now.

5
Share this post

Joe Biden's criminal justice regression

www.lawdork.com
Previous
Next
5 Comments
Gretchen
Mar 7

It does not matter whether or not Biden approved of the changes to DC code. It does of matter if Bowser vetoed it. It doesn’t even matter if they’re evidence-based or fair or just.

The changes were made through the democratic laws of DC and should not be overruled. Period.

Expand full comment
Reply
Erik Paulson
Mar 7

Yes yes and yes... Biden is a ghoul when will Reaganism die?

Expand full comment
Reply
3 more comments…
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Chris Geidner
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing