Ruling responds to appeals courts that upheld state bans. Their reasoning "renders the Fourteenth Amendment largely meaningless," U.S. District Judge B. Lynn Winmill wrote.
Past time I supported this fine work, Chris. Happy New Year and thank you for making me smarter (starting from zero makes it easier already but seriously, good work & good writing steepens the brain-curve).
"[T]he office’s lawyers being designated as “special deputy attorneys general,” as agreed to in the contract obtained by Law Dork in response to a public records request."
Past time I supported this fine work, Chris. Happy New Year and thank you for making me smarter (starting from zero makes it easier already but seriously, good work & good writing steepens the brain-curve).
Thanks!
"[T]he office’s lawyers being designated as “special deputy attorneys general,” as agreed to in the contract obtained by Law Dork in response to a public records request."
Look at you doing some legwork. Awesome job!
I had actually already obtained it, from the earlier ADF report, but it didn't really fit in well enough to mention it. But, thanks!
Why can't the 14th be applied to women and health care. Wasn't our "liberty" taken away? Our freedom to choose? And are we not now disempowered?
Research this https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/gender-equality/