Would not *animus* also receive short shrift on appeal to the 11th CA as did "parental rights", or "equal protection", etc., based upon the controlling opinion in *Eknes-Tucker* ? And would the same tRumpy three-judge panel also hear the FL appeal?
Would not *animus* also receive short shrift on appeal to the 11th CA as did "parental rights", or "equal protection", etc., based upon the controlling opinion in *Eknes-Tucker* ? And would the same tRumpy three-judge panel also hear the FL appeal?
Would not *animus* also receive short shrift on appeal to the 11th CA as did "parental rights", or "equal protection", etc., based upon the controlling opinion in *Eknes-Tucker* ? And would the same tRumpy three-judge panel also hear the FL appeal?