Every time I read yet another court case regarding some effing state's anti-trans legislation, I am dumbfounded that medical decisions, considered within a family, in concert with physicians using approved methodologies, are - ffs! - SOMEHOW a matter for state regulation or prohibition.
I mean, it's prima facie blatantly unconstitutional,…
Every time I read yet another court case regarding some effing state's anti-trans legislation, I am dumbfounded that medical decisions, considered within a family, in concert with physicians using approved methodologies, are - ffs! - SOMEHOW a matter for state regulation or prohibition.
I mean, it's prima facie blatantly unconstitutional, depriving a class of people AND their family AND their physician(s) freedom of choice, and depriving them of even the pretense of due process and/or equal protection.
How can this be? And why isn't it patently obvious that SCOTUS should find for the plaintiffs?...but maybe WON'T?
Every time I read yet another court case regarding some effing state's anti-trans legislation, I am dumbfounded that medical decisions, considered within a family, in concert with physicians using approved methodologies, are - ffs! - SOMEHOW a matter for state regulation or prohibition.
I mean, it's prima facie blatantly unconstitutional, depriving a class of people AND their family AND their physician(s) freedom of choice, and depriving them of even the pretense of due process and/or equal protection.
How can this be? And why isn't it patently obvious that SCOTUS should find for the plaintiffs?...but maybe WON'T?
The mind boggles.