True. On the whole, the left is on its back foot now, and can no longer look to the federal judiciary as a check on the right; so regulatory agencies acting under Chevron would serve as that check. (I hope that's a proper appreciation of your statement). But Chevron, essentially, reinforced the actions of whatever philosophy held a major…
True. On the whole, the left is on its back foot now, and can no longer look to the federal judiciary as a check on the right; so regulatory agencies acting under Chevron would serve as that check. (I hope that's a proper appreciation of your statement). But Chevron, essentially, reinforced the actions of whatever philosophy held a majoritarian position, by streamlining the process of enforcing that position. But what if that majoritarian position switches poles? Would an authoritarian like or dislike having powers created by Chevron?
True. On the whole, the left is on its back foot now, and can no longer look to the federal judiciary as a check on the right; so regulatory agencies acting under Chevron would serve as that check. (I hope that's a proper appreciation of your statement). But Chevron, essentially, reinforced the actions of whatever philosophy held a majoritarian position, by streamlining the process of enforcing that position. But what if that majoritarian position switches poles? Would an authoritarian like or dislike having powers created by Chevron?