The order enjoins the state from enforcing new puberty blocker or hormone bans, as well as a ban on "aiding and abetting" others in providing gender-affirming medical care for trans children.
All of these various laws were passed by old white men whose sensibilities are offended by people they don't understand and people they personally hate because they are bigots and/or religious zealots. They knew at the time they passed these laws that they were likely to be held unconstitutional but they did it anyway to appease other bigots and religious zealots - most of whom have never met or encountered a trans individual throughout the course of their dismal, pathetic lives. ALL of these people will burn in the fires of hell for eternity because of their hatred and their easy desire to inflict pain on people who are different.
On another topic entirely, I would like a legal perspective on the Teamster strike against Amazon via a contractor, “Battle Tested Strategies”. How can they ask a company not their employer to bargain? How might the NLRB interpret it? I never heard of a unionized parts supplier demanding GM, Ford, or Chrysler bargain with them, and, historically, many of those suppliers had the same kind of less-than-arms-length relationship to automakers.
More good news. 👍
All of these various laws were passed by old white men whose sensibilities are offended by people they don't understand and people they personally hate because they are bigots and/or religious zealots. They knew at the time they passed these laws that they were likely to be held unconstitutional but they did it anyway to appease other bigots and religious zealots - most of whom have never met or encountered a trans individual throughout the course of their dismal, pathetic lives. ALL of these people will burn in the fires of hell for eternity because of their hatred and their easy desire to inflict pain on people who are different.
Every time I read of another sane, legal and humane decision by a Trump-appointed judge, I feel like we’ve dodged a bullet.
This is great news!
On another topic entirely, I would like a legal perspective on the Teamster strike against Amazon via a contractor, “Battle Tested Strategies”. How can they ask a company not their employer to bargain? How might the NLRB interpret it? I never heard of a unionized parts supplier demanding GM, Ford, or Chrysler bargain with them, and, historically, many of those suppliers had the same kind of less-than-arms-length relationship to automakers.