Lawyers for Mifeprex maker call ruling "an unprecedented judicial assault." [Update: Response due Tuesday.] Also: A request for clarification in the Washington mifepristone case.
Excellent post. Thank you. Talk about evidence. Nothing spells rock solid, air tight, take it to the bank, like Judge K’s authoritative judicial recognition of “anonymous blog posts”.
I worry about the appeal’s hanging their hats on the standing issue. Hasn’t Planned Parenthood, the ACLU, et Al always sued on behalf of the Clinics and not the pregnant person? If PP has standing, don’t the four docs/orgs have it too?
THANK YOU FOR YOUR WORK!!!! I have been depending on several sub stack writers and their audio versions available to ALL subscribers. People who cannot read are the most likely to be strapped for money and unable to buy Lattes not to mention paid subscriptions. Suddenly, with NO prior warning, audio versions are NOT available.
Excellent post. Thank you. Talk about evidence. Nothing spells rock solid, air tight, take it to the bank, like Judge K’s authoritative judicial recognition of “anonymous blog posts”.
I worry about the appeal’s hanging their hats on the standing issue. Hasn’t Planned Parenthood, the ACLU, et Al always sued on behalf of the Clinics and not the pregnant person? If PP has standing, don’t the four docs/orgs have it too?
THANK YOU FOR YOUR WORK!!!! I have been depending on several sub stack writers and their audio versions available to ALL subscribers. People who cannot read are the most likely to be strapped for money and unable to buy Lattes not to mention paid subscriptions. Suddenly, with NO prior warning, audio versions are NOT available.