Update: The marshal "spoke" with the justices, but it's not clear that really changes much, given that they weren't required to sign sworn affidavits like everyone else questioned.
This "investigation" was a total fraud. I have little doubt that that had the "leaker" been a liberal, we would know their name by now. Since it was probably a conservative (justice, spouse or clerk), we will never know who it was.
Interesting. Does this mean that the Justices are above the law? That they are the true elite? I remain eager to hear if you get a response to your question as to whether or not the Justices were questioned. It seems that it should be easy to answer, a simple “yes” or “no”.
Guess I was wrong. The answer wasn’t a simple yes or no…. It was more of a “yes there was a discussion with the Justices but there was no need for them to swear to tell the truth because after all they are the Supreme Court Justices. Also no need to examine any of their phones. Would a Justice lie or attempt to cover up the truth?”
This "investigation" was a total fraud. I have little doubt that that had the "leaker" been a liberal, we would know their name by now. Since it was probably a conservative (justice, spouse or clerk), we will never know who it was.
Interesting. Does this mean that the Justices are above the law? That they are the true elite? I remain eager to hear if you get a response to your question as to whether or not the Justices were questioned. It seems that it should be easy to answer, a simple “yes” or “no”.
Guess I was wrong. The answer wasn’t a simple yes or no…. It was more of a “yes there was a discussion with the Justices but there was no need for them to swear to tell the truth because after all they are the Supreme Court Justices. Also no need to examine any of their phones. Would a Justice lie or attempt to cover up the truth?”