Orders from two Republican judicial appointees Thursday show greater willingness to push back with increasingly harsh tools in the face of continued Trump admin lawlessness.
In my many years litigating in Federal courts, I saw on some few occasions some inexperienced lawyers out of their depth. I never saw this degree of bad lawyering, unethical conduct and disregard for the responsibilities members of the bar owe the courts and their profession.
ICE is used to working with immigration judges who are political appointees and employees of the executive branch, and who generally function as part of the prosecution team. They seem truly stunned to have to deal with real judges who care about fair and neutral application of the law.
Chris, thank you for continuing to highlight my community when it would be much easier to focus on anything else. I appreciate it more than you could ever know.
it took me about 30 seconds on google to find "If you have a total population of 75 items, a statistically strong sample typically ranges between 43 and 63 items, depending on your required precision." Not twelve, and particularly not the "first twelve." Rosen doesn't seem any more proficient at Google than he is as a prosecutor.
But if you only use AI or more likely, LLM, you gets what you pay for. I heard a great report on BBC radio last weekend on errors in LLM useage in research papers; an LLM citation in a paper was to "first name, last name, others."
Trump is obviously a dictator. So what? I mean, what do you think "democracy" can do about it? Trump won by a LANDSLIDE. So did Mamdani in New York. Trump disobeys judges. Duh! Judges disobey the law ALL THE TIME. So what? Who do you suppose you could elect and why would that person be able to fix it even if she wanted to, which she doesn't. Pick any hot-button issue of today you want. So fricking what?
In my many years litigating in Federal courts, I saw on some few occasions some inexperienced lawyers out of their depth. I never saw this degree of bad lawyering, unethical conduct and disregard for the responsibilities members of the bar owe the courts and their profession.
ICE is used to working with immigration judges who are political appointees and employees of the executive branch, and who generally function as part of the prosecution team. They seem truly stunned to have to deal with real judges who care about fair and neutral application of the law.
I guess the “reasoning” is, If the president and attorney general can ignore the law, anyone can.
Chris, thank you for continuing to highlight my community when it would be much easier to focus on anything else. I appreciate it more than you could ever know.
it took me about 30 seconds on google to find "If you have a total population of 75 items, a statistically strong sample typically ranges between 43 and 63 items, depending on your required precision." Not twelve, and particularly not the "first twelve." Rosen doesn't seem any more proficient at Google than he is as a prosecutor.
But if you only use AI or more likely, LLM, you gets what you pay for. I heard a great report on BBC radio last weekend on errors in LLM useage in research papers; an LLM citation in a paper was to "first name, last name, others."
Sounds like those DOJ “attorneys” are arguing for an audience of one.
Trump is obviously a dictator. So what? I mean, what do you think "democracy" can do about it? Trump won by a LANDSLIDE. So did Mamdani in New York. Trump disobeys judges. Duh! Judges disobey the law ALL THE TIME. So what? Who do you suppose you could elect and why would that person be able to fix it even if she wanted to, which she doesn't. Pick any hot-button issue of today you want. So fricking what?