On Tuesday, the Arizona Supreme Court held that a near-total criminal abortion ban first passed in 1864 can be enforced. But, a November vote could change that.
The only way to resolved this is by introducing a constitutional amendment viz., "Life begins at birth and ends at death". This provision shall be enforced as self executing : 1. Believe whatever you like but if you impose a belief contrary to this amendment on any other person or group and that fact is established beyond any reasonable doubt then you are strictly liable to serve a prison term of not less than two years"
I want to thank you for hope courage and honesty reporting truth to power with evidence. The majority stair steps an opinion not to heaven rather a sink hole of prejudicial ambiguity. Voters in AZ will climb the mountain of justice and inclusion on Nov 5, 2024. We are n this together.
It’s like the California parol evidence rule. If the is no patent ambiguity on the face of the contract, extrinsic evidence may be admissible to show a latent ambiguity. And pretty soon, it’s a tort case.
Insanity, and the 7-0 conservative Iowa Supreme Court will hear oral arguments tomorrow on re-instating the 6-week abortion ban, so this summer we're going to have Arizona, Florida, Iowa and like Utah with complete or 6 week abortion bans.
1864...when women were chattel, without freedom or the vote. While slavery still existed.
What kind of warped mentality considers this a good basis for a legal decision?
Well, at least we know this will bite the dust in November.
The only way to resolved this is by introducing a constitutional amendment viz., "Life begins at birth and ends at death". This provision shall be enforced as self executing : 1. Believe whatever you like but if you impose a belief contrary to this amendment on any other person or group and that fact is established beyond any reasonable doubt then you are strictly liable to serve a prison term of not less than two years"
Chris,
I want to thank you for hope courage and honesty reporting truth to power with evidence. The majority stair steps an opinion not to heaven rather a sink hole of prejudicial ambiguity. Voters in AZ will climb the mountain of justice and inclusion on Nov 5, 2024. We are n this together.
It’s like the California parol evidence rule. If the is no patent ambiguity on the face of the contract, extrinsic evidence may be admissible to show a latent ambiguity. And pretty soon, it’s a tort case.
Insanity, and the 7-0 conservative Iowa Supreme Court will hear oral arguments tomorrow on re-instating the 6-week abortion ban, so this summer we're going to have Arizona, Florida, Iowa and like Utah with complete or 6 week abortion bans.