4 Comments

Way too much to comment on after looking at the specifics of some of these bills. But I was fascinated by the Oklahoma definition of "female" as “Female” means a natural person whose biological reproductive system is developed to produce ova"

What happens to women whose reproductive system does not in fact produce ova--infertility patients if they want to be pregnant, simply relieved of the danger if they do not? Are they excluded from whatever rights are protected by the bill? Does one have to prove, if one of those rights are violated, that one's biological reproductive system produces ova?

And are those whose reproductive systems haven't developed also not female? So "girl" includes only those post-puberty?

Never let it be said that your average GOP lawmaker has much skill at drafting bills rationally.

Expand full comment

1) Yes, I pay more taxes because I live in a blue state.

2) Yes, I am very happy that I live in a State where there are no bigoted, hate-motivated bills like these which are being contemplated.

Expand full comment

It might be a worthwhile strategy to put out ads digital and tv exposing those behind this “this is alliance defending freedom they claim to be a group supporting parents rights but in reality .....”

Expand full comment

If Dems in Kentucky are going to retaliate with focused ad campaigns now is the time before the governor vetos it most of Kentucky voters are not even aware of this bill

Expand full comment