Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ian Mark Sirota's avatar

In the Texas case, it must be mentioned that the story has been featured prominently on the execrable Tucker Carlson's show, and that as soon as he called for a pardon, his lapdog, Governor Abbott, echoed Carlson's words.

Expand full comment
Susan Linehan's avatar

How in the world is it the job of a governor to substitute his "questions" about a trial verdict for the judicial process, any more than it is the job of Jordan to interfere with a criminal prosecution. Once the "questions" have been addressed on appeal, if the person with pardon power still disagrees, or even supports pardoning for other reasons than an "innocence" he perceives, then he can pardon. The pardon can be based on nothing more than the idea that the next Ted Bundy's grandmother was a friend of the governor--nothing can stop the pardon. But to stop the PROCESS is not just a norm broken. It is a full out executive branch attack on the judicial system.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts