There is a reason people were afraid that the Supreme Court would take up case. The reason is the Supreme Court itself. Here's why I'm taking this whole experience seriously.
What I noticed was that, due to all the relief that the court didn't take up Davis's case, a lot of people didn't notice that they did take up the challenge to counting mail ballots received after election day. I don't know if it was strategic or just happenstance, but the mail ballot case could well effect next year's elections.
Superb! But begs the question: What is WRONG with America? Because Donald Trump is a lout, and his conservative court, a safe space for the tone deaf elite, does that give license for the riffraff to act out? Neither CIC nor SCOTUS care or even notice them.
It’s hard to believe that the VRA is on the verge of being dismantled. I’m aware Roberts hasn’t been a proponent of it ever since the Reagan Administration, but to strip Sec 2 would cause racial segregation nationwide without federal legal recourse! It’s disgusting how blatantly unconstitutional and discriminatory this would be.
Excellent point! I think that Roberts will retain the slightest shred - lip service, really - of the VRA … simply to preserve his “legacy” and not be recorded as the most racist CJ since Taney.
I agree that they're waiting for/ encouraging a better case. Davis flat out broke the law. I have no delusions that they won't overturn gay marriage if there's a clear way to present and argue the case. Why on earth would this court want to protect gay marriage??
A content creator from Phill who goes by the name Gaylawer said the Kim Davis case was never the pathway to overturning Obergefell. She feels that a case decided in 2024 with Justice Comey Barrett writing the opinion in State v Munoz which was the beginning of the erosion of marriage equality. I would love to read your thoughts.
every American same-sex couple should file a class action against Davis for emotional distress. not because they would likely win anything (i’m neither a lawyer nor am I pursuing marriage with someone of the same sex as me) but for the principle of the thing. i have no doubt her actions have been extremely distressing to so many people. how sad she couldn’t leave well enough alone.
Many strong critics of SCOTUS and supporters of marriage rights (including one legal contributor directly protected) explained that this case was a dud. But people were concerned for a reason, as noted, including because this Supreme Court has harmed LGBTQ rights in a variety of ways.
Chris, thank you so much for everything you do & write. I especially appreciate how you translate “legalese” into plain language, and how you delve into the details in order to explain the bigger picture.
I had heard before about the desire to undo substantive due process, but was unaware it had been raised in this case. Thank you for that.
It does seem to me that substantive due process is fundamental to protection of our rights and liberties. By definition, it means due process that is real and is not subordinate to other concerns. Simply saying "we went through the formal motions, so that's enough" in fact isn't. That is, isn't good enough.
Which is my wordy way of saying that I agree that the attacks on substantive due process are a danger to any future progress and indeed to maintaining the progress we have made.
Thank you for reporting on the grounded without letting sensationalism reign. This admin has made it very difficult to convince myself that we aren’t imploding further every second, and every article from y’all keeps my mental rooted in pragmatic awareness instead of a doom-spiral 💚
Thank you Chris. You are
1 of the guardrails of
justice and your reports
and intuitive reasoning
are important for all.
What I noticed was that, due to all the relief that the court didn't take up Davis's case, a lot of people didn't notice that they did take up the challenge to counting mail ballots received after election day. I don't know if it was strategic or just happenstance, but the mail ballot case could well effect next year's elections.
This has provided valuable insight into the future trajectory of the U.S. Supreme Court. You have open my eyes... Wide!
Bout time too.
What did gay people do to this Staver person?
Most people just want to be left alone.
Superb! But begs the question: What is WRONG with America? Because Donald Trump is a lout, and his conservative court, a safe space for the tone deaf elite, does that give license for the riffraff to act out? Neither CIC nor SCOTUS care or even notice them.
It’s hard to believe that the VRA is on the verge of being dismantled. I’m aware Roberts hasn’t been a proponent of it ever since the Reagan Administration, but to strip Sec 2 would cause racial segregation nationwide without federal legal recourse! It’s disgusting how blatantly unconstitutional and discriminatory this would be.
Excellent point! I think that Roberts will retain the slightest shred - lip service, really - of the VRA … simply to preserve his “legacy” and not be recorded as the most racist CJ since Taney.
H seeks to be remembered as a statesman, but his actions ensure that only his villainous decisions outlive him and are remembered.
Agreed … save that I think he believes his elitism, his white supremacy IS the (unspoken) foundation of America.
He and his cronies count on short memories and powerful institutional racism to protect their legacies.
And to cancel history by dumbing down education … the casual acceptance of lies as “alternate facts” paves the way.
Perhaps the Court is biding their time, looking for a better case
I don't think we are out of the woods yet.
I agree that they're waiting for/ encouraging a better case. Davis flat out broke the law. I have no delusions that they won't overturn gay marriage if there's a clear way to present and argue the case. Why on earth would this court want to protect gay marriage??
I don't think they do given three of them were in the dissent in Obergefell.
Excellent analysis.
Chris, have you heard this?
A content creator from Phill who goes by the name Gaylawer said the Kim Davis case was never the pathway to overturning Obergefell. She feels that a case decided in 2024 with Justice Comey Barrett writing the opinion in State v Munoz which was the beginning of the erosion of marriage equality. I would love to read your thoughts.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_State_v._Mu%C3%B1oz
every American same-sex couple should file a class action against Davis for emotional distress. not because they would likely win anything (i’m neither a lawyer nor am I pursuing marriage with someone of the same sex as me) but for the principle of the thing. i have no doubt her actions have been extremely distressing to so many people. how sad she couldn’t leave well enough alone.
Many strong critics of SCOTUS and supporters of marriage rights (including one legal contributor directly protected) explained that this case was a dud. But people were concerned for a reason, as noted, including because this Supreme Court has harmed LGBTQ rights in a variety of ways.
Some important caveats and context for what is still definitely great news. Thank you for your coverage!
What is the total amount, Silly Kim now owes with the; judgment, interest, court cost and paying the lawyer fees for the plaintiffs.
Chris, thank you so much for everything you do & write. I especially appreciate how you translate “legalese” into plain language, and how you delve into the details in order to explain the bigger picture.
I had heard before about the desire to undo substantive due process, but was unaware it had been raised in this case. Thank you for that.
It does seem to me that substantive due process is fundamental to protection of our rights and liberties. By definition, it means due process that is real and is not subordinate to other concerns. Simply saying "we went through the formal motions, so that's enough" in fact isn't. That is, isn't good enough.
Which is my wordy way of saying that I agree that the attacks on substantive due process are a danger to any future progress and indeed to maintaining the progress we have made.
Thank you for reporting on the grounded without letting sensationalism reign. This admin has made it very difficult to convince myself that we aren’t imploding further every second, and every article from y’all keeps my mental rooted in pragmatic awareness instead of a doom-spiral 💚