Law Dork

Share this post

Judges and democracy, and democracy

www.lawdork.com

Discover more from Law Dork

The Supreme Court, law, politics, and more.
Over 21,000 subscribers
Continue reading
Sign in

Judges and democracy, and democracy

Biden and the Senate must prioritize getting judges confirmed. Also: The elections were mostly good for democracy, but there are still daily reminders of ongoing difficulties.

Chris Geidner
Nov 18, 2022
15
Share this post

Judges and democracy, and democracy

www.lawdork.com
1
Share

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announcing that she will not seek a leadership position in the next Congress.

While a few races remain outstanding — including most notably the Georgia US Senate race, which is set for a Dec. 6 runoff — the main contours of political power in DC and across most of the nation next year are clear. In DC, Democrats kept control of the Senate with a razor-thin majority while Republicans have, just barely, wrested control of the House. The coming changes in Congress were made abundantly clear on Thursday when House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced that, after 20 years as the leader of the House Democrats, she will not be seeking a leadership post in the new Congress.

As Pelosi noted in her floor speech, however, this was a good election for democracy.

Since I wrote on Nov. 11 about the elections, there was even more good news for democracy — with election-denying secretary of state candidates losing in Arizona and Nevada. And, Kari Lake, one of the most concerning gubernatorial candidates who actually had a shot of winning, lost her race in Arizona.

Rick Hasen, a law professor and national expert on the dangers our democracy faces, even wrote that, after these elections, “I’m a bit less terrified” for democracy.

And yet, there is much more ahead. In addition to Twitter’s future, which is a constant question these days, two other topics keep catching my attention this week: The continued opportunity Democrats have to move judicial nominations — another important move to help secure democracy — and the continued threats to democracy at state and local levels.

Law Dork, with Chris Geidner, is independent, reader-supported journalism that seeks to hold government and other public officials accountable. Support this reporting by becoming a free or paid subscriber today.


JUDGES: Earlier this week, I wrote for MSNBC about how President Biden, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, and Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Dick Durbin have to set a goal of filling all judicial vacancies in the next Congress:

Democrats need to treat judges and judicial appointments as the bulwark against future efforts to undermine democracy that they can and should be. That means judicial appointments must be a primary goal of the next Senate.

Specifically, I wrote that “if Republicans do end up controlling the House, Schumer should immediately declare judicial appointments to be Senate Democrats’ No. 1 focus.” (My friend Jay Willis at Balls and Strikes heartily agrees.)

Well, the Republicans crossed that threshold in the House on Wednesday evening, so, here we are. In addition to Schumer, I discuss why Sen. Raphael Warnock’s re-election is so important, why blue slips must go (Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Dick Durbin’s area), and what the White House needs to do.

Twitter avatar for @chrisgeidner
Chris “Subscribe to Law Dork!” Geidner @chrisgeidner
My latest at @MSNBC: Judges, and what needs to happen. 1/ Schumer needs to make clear judges are top priority. (Win Georgia.) 2/ Biden needs to ramp up nominations, incl. where the WH isn't getting recommendations. 3/ Durbin needs to end blue slips. msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-…
Democrats can’t afford to wait. Diminishing the power of partisan, conservative courts is necessary.
5:43 PM ∙ Nov 15, 2022
265Likes72Retweets

In addition to the officials discussed in my column, Demand Justice brought a further group to the discussion, recommending in a memo put out this week that federal judges also have a role to play — by considering taking senior status if eligible so that the Biden can name a successor.

ACTION NEEDED FROM FEDERAL JUDGES  Senate Democrats are not the only ones who must act to allow President Biden to maximize his impact on our courts. There were 49 announced circuit and district court vacancies when President Biden took office, but that number more than doubled within three months, thanks to judges announcing plans to retire or take senior status. Over the past six months, these announcements have slowed to a trickle, as judges likely have been reluctant to create vacancies that a Republican Senate would have stopped from being filled. Now that Democrats have been projected to continue controlling the Senate, judges eligible to take senior status should announce their intent to do so without delay.

But that’s not all that’s going on with judges. The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights sent a letter from more than 200 organizations to the Senate Democrats just before the midterm elections pressing them to do all they can to confirm as many current judicial nominees in the lame-duck session before the new Congress takes office in January.

November 7, 2022 Dear Senator, On behalf of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the undersigned 214 organizations, we write to emphasize the urgency of prioritizing the continued confirmation of experientially and demographically diverse judicial nominees by the end of the 117th Congress. We celebrate the progress made towards strengthening our judiciary with the confirmation of nominees committed to our civil rights, and we urge you to redouble your efforts so that all pending judicial nominees are confirmed.

Such confirmations would, of course, help to move more Biden nominees onto the courts more quickly — but it also would help give more space for additional nominees in the next Congress.

Law Dork, with Chris Geidner, provides extensive coverage of judicial nominations and the underlying politics. Subscribe now.


DEMOCRACY: Despite the significant good news for democracy, there were many signs this week of the ongoing challenges to democracy and the rule of law.

Pennsylvania’s House on Wednesday impeached the twice-elected district attorney of Philadelphia, Democrat Larry Krasner, because the Republican leaders don’t like his policy positions — policies that Krasner’s constituents are aware of and re-elected him to continue advancing.

This is an extraordinary abuse of the legislature’s authority and an incredible offense to democracy and the voters of Philadelphia — as well as all of Pennsylvania. As the Philadelphia Inquirer noted:

The chamber hasn’t impeached an officeholder in nearly 30 years, and the Pennsylvania legislature has sought to remove someone from office only a handful of times over the last three centuries.

In part of his statement responding to the vote, Krasner said:

History will harshly judge this anti-democratic authoritarian effort to erase Philly’s votes – votes by Black, brown, and broke people in Philadelphia. And voters will have the last word.

Despite the House vote, it still seems unlikely Krasner would actually be removed from office. A Senate trial would have to take place convicting him by a 2/3 majority, which would require support from several Democrats.

But, regardless of the outcome, the action itself here is harmful, in terms of the message it sends about the legislature’s view of the state’s voters and the time and energy (and money) it takes from both Krasner and his office — time and energy (and money) better spent elsewhere.

Just to the west, in Ohio, Republicans are supporting multiple anti-democratic steps.

After Democratic-backed wins in state board of education races, Republic lawmakers responded by announcing that they are looking to consolidate control of education in the state under the governor — a Republican, Mike DeWine, who was just re-elected to that office — and away from the state board of education.

Then, on Thursday, Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose, another Republican, announced his support for a measure to require that any constitutional amendment put forth by voters receive 60 percent support to pass. The new 60 percent requirement would only apply to voter-backed initiatives, not those put forward by lawmakers themselves.

Twitter avatar for @KatyAShanahan
Katy Shanahan @KatyAShanahan
But what LaRose doesn’t want is for the illegally rigged legislature to have to also face 60% of the voters to approve their constitutional amendments. Just an appalling power grab.
Twitter avatar for @darreldrowland
Darrel Rowland @darreldrowland
It's confirmed: Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose wants a 60% supermajority of Ohio voters to amend the state constitution https://t.co/YtQ24yLuId
6:57 PM ∙ Nov 17, 2022
24Likes17Retweets

And, as always, there’s Florida, where five school board members who Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis appointed voted to oust the school’s superintendent — over the objection of the four remaining elected members.

Thanks for reading Law Dork. Subscribe now!

15
Share this post

Judges and democracy, and democracy

www.lawdork.com
1
Share
Previous
Next
1 Comment
Share this discussion

Judges and democracy, and democracy

www.lawdork.com
Ian Mark Sirota
Writes Ian’s Substack
Nov 18, 2022

THANK YOU! This is what I have been saying ever since President Biden was elected and the Democrats secured control of the Senate--appointing and confirming judges is priority number one. Republicans/conservatives long ago realized the oversized role that the Courts play in our democracy.

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Chris Geidner
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing